I never finished the book because it never finished with me.

What’s a book you never finished but still think about?


There is a book I started reading about twenty years ago called The Mystic Thesaurus, by Willis F. Whitehead.

I never finished it.

Or perhaps, after twenty years, I am beginning to realise that I did—just not in the way one normally finishes a book.

Somewhere in its pages I encountered the practice of working with a black mirror. I made one for myself: small enough to hold in my hands, its dark surface deliberately curved so that the reflection would never quite settle into an ordinary image.

I learned to sit with it. To become quiet. To observe.

Observing the reflection



And I kept doing that.

The book eventually returned to the shelf. Much of what I had read faded from conscious memory. Life moved on. Other books came. Other philosophies. My work, my runes, my spiritual practice, my attempts to understand systems and people and myself.

But the mirror remained.

Twenty years later, I have returned to The Mystic Thesaurus, and something rather wonderful has happened.

I recognise myself in it.

Not because I remember all the words, but because I recognise the way of seeing it was quietly teaching me.

Whitehead spoke of three ways of approaching reality: Occult, Philosophy and Natural Magic.

Today I understand those words rather differently from how I might have understood them twenty years ago.

Occult is the willingness to look beneath what is immediately apparent—to observe carefully enough that hidden patterns and relationships begin to emerge.

Philosophy is what prevents us from simply believing the first pattern we see. We contemplate it. Question it. Turn it around. Ask what it means and whether our interpretation remains coherent when tested against experience.

Natural Magic is where contemplation finally returns us to life. Once we understand something of the relationships in which we participate, we act. Not by demanding that reality obey us, but by understanding proportion, relationship, rhythm and consequence well enough to participate more consciously within it.

See. Understand. Participate. Then observe again.

Perhaps that was the real lesson of the mirror.

The strange reflection was never the important thing. The important thing was learning to remain the observer while appearances changed—and then carrying that quality of observation back into ordinary life.

Looking back now, I can see traces of that lesson in how I think about almost everything. I look for patterns. I explore relationships. I distrust conclusions that arrive too quickly. I allow ideas to mature. And eventually I ask the question that matters:

What does this understanding ask me to do differently?

So what is a book I never finished but still think about?

The Mystic Thesaurus.

Except I’m not sure I really think about the book very often.

For twenty years, I have been thinking, observing and participating through a door that the book opened.

Perhaps some books are finished when you turn the final page.

And perhaps there are a few that you never finish because, somewhere along the way, you stop reading the book and begin living the question it placed in your hands.

When mourning turns into vision of what could be.

If you could go back and witness any historical event, which one would you pick?

There are moments in history when all seems lost, and yet it is precisely in such moments that a light can be lit that illuminates something enduring in the human soul.

Athens, 431 BCE.

Athenian warriors had been buried. Wives, children, parents and friends were saying their goodbyes. I imagine the tears, the cries, the terrible emptiness left behind when those you love do not return from war.

Then one man stepped forward to address the crowd.

His name was Pericles.

431 BCE



I would like to have stood among those people and heard what he actually said.

Pericles did something remarkable that day. He did not simply praise the dead. He turned the attention of the living towards a much more uncomfortable question:

Did these men die for something worthy of their lives?

What kind of society is worth defending at such a cost?

In asking that question, Pericles shifted the moment from mourning alone towards a vision of what Athens could be. He spoke about the kind of citizen such a society should cultivate: free, responsible, courageous, thoughtful, engaged in public life and capable of acting when action was required.

He sketched an ideal of a society worthy of such citizens.

Athens itself certainly did not always live up to that ideal. Perhaps no society ever has. But the vision has survived for almost two and a half thousand years because the question remains.

What kind of society is worthy of our lives?

If I could go back and witness any historical event, I would therefore choose that funeral oration in 431 BCE.

Part of my fascination is that we don’t actually know exactly what Pericles said. What survives is the version presented by Thucydides in History of the Peloponnesian War. Thucydides tells us that in recording speeches he tried to remain faithful to their general meaning while presenting what the occasion seemed to require.

So I would want to hear the words that history has lost.

But even more than that, I would want to experience the moment.

I want to stand quietly among those mourning families. I want to hear the murmur of the crowd fall silent. I want to hear the warmth and strength in Pericles’ voice rather than merely reading words preserved on a page. I want to feel that strange transition as grief is slowly transformed into reflection, and reflection into a vision of the kind of people the living might still become.

And then I would bring one thing back with me.

Not the exact words of Pericles.

The question.

Because perhaps that is a question our own world needs again.

We spend enormous energy asking what society owes us. Perhaps occasionally we should hold society up like a mirror and ask something deeper:

What kind of people are we becoming together?

Do our institutions cultivate courage, freedom, responsibility, wisdom and human flourishing? Do our own lives contribute towards creating such a society?

And finally, looking into that mirror:

Is what we are creating together worthy of a human life?

That is why, given one journey into history, I would choose Athens in 431 BCE.

I would stand among the mourners and listen.

From a Bee on My Bum to the Mystery of Being

If you had to get a tattoo right now, what would it be and why?


It took me years to confess that I have a bee on my bum.

Seriously.

Even close friends and family did not know about the little bumblebee hiding there. And although it is small, once people discovered it, it tended to leave them with unanswered questions.

Why a bee?

Why there?

What does it mean?

Curiosity can eat at a person when you leave a question unanswered.

The bee stood for Being.

Behind that slightly ridiculous little tattoo was something rather serious: the Gurdjieff idea that human development requires us to grow not only in knowledge, but also in being. We can accumulate facts, theories and clever ideas throughout our lives, yet remain essentially the same person. Knowledge without a corresponding transformation of being is incomplete.

Few people who discovered my little bee ever grasped the weight I had attached to such a simple image.

But if I had to get another tattoo today, it certainly wouldn’t be hidden on my bum.

It would be an armband around my left upper arm, just below the tattoo already on my shoulder.

And this time, I would make the mystery considerably harder to solve.

My passion and philosophy have become deeply intertwined with the Armanen runes. Most people who encounter them know that the system was put forward by Guido von List. Far fewer venture into the strange architecture of symbolism, sound and meaning that lies beneath the surface.

So my armband would contain something even more obscure.

Three magical vowel cubes derived from List’s Ursprache.

Three 5 × 5 arrangements of vowel sounds.

The Theonium.

The Damonium.

The Arch-Damonium.

Three formulae associated with the great movement of existence: becoming, being and passing away.

They are not merely symbols to be looked at. They are formulae intended to be visualised, pondered and sounded—to become objects of meditation and contemplation.

And perhaps that is precisely why I would wear them.

A good symbol should not explain itself too easily.

It should disturb certainty just enough to awaken curiosity.

Someone might look at the strange cubes encircling my arm and ask:

What on earth does that mean?

Excellent.

Now the symbol has begun its work.

Because perhaps mystery is not something that hides truth from us. Perhaps mystery is what entices us to approach truths that cannot be reduced to ordinary explanations.

You contemplate the pattern.

You sound the vowels.

You wrestle with becoming, being and passing away.

And perhaps—who knows?—somewhere beyond the symbols, concepts and sounds, the initiated might glimpse something that cannot adequately be spoken at all: the incomprehensible and unfathomable source from which all BEING arises.

Which brings me back to that little yellow bee.

What began as a bee on my bum slowly became, over the course of a lifetime, a formula of Being.

Not bad for a tattoo nobody was supposed to see.

Timeless Vowel Alchemy

If you had a time machine and could send just one message to your past self, what would it say?

“If you had a time machine and could send just one message to your past self, what would it say?”

Easy!

“AUOOIAAAOIAOIAAAYEIO”

He will be a little confused.

But that’s okay.

The vowel alchemy will work its magic. 😏

Eventually, he’ll understand.

Everyone else would assume the time machine malfunctioned.

Mickey: Whose Da Man?

Share a photo of your pet and tell us one thing that makes them uniquely them.

Mickey

Meet Mickey, the Maltese.


Don’t let the fluffy white exterior fool you. Mickey has the heart of a warrior.


He once survived a fight with a Rottweiler, and apparently learned entirely the wrong lesson from the experience. Rather than deciding that discretion might sometimes be the better part of valour, Mickey concluded that he could take on the world.
He never backs down.


Push him, and he pushes back. Give him a hiding, and he will growl and try to bite back. Put him in the car with his nose out of the window at 120 km/h and he will stand his ground against the wind, looking less like a little Maltese and more like an astronaut undergoing G-force testing.


But beneath all that bravado lives an extraordinarily sensitive little dog.
Mickey has perfected a look that can convince you he has never been loved, fed or shown a moment of kindness in his entire life. He can look deeply sorry for himself even while receiving precisely the attention he was seeking.


And Mickey loves attention.


Especially from the ladies.


Human ladies are welcome, but canine ladies are even better. If there happens to be a female dog in heat somewhere in the neighbourhood, our fearless warrior transforms into an escape artist. He successfully disappeared in pursuit of romance twice.


Eventually, however, Mickey became a respectable family man. By arrangement between the humans, he was introduced to QT, and together they produced two batches of puppies. Mickey had officially become a father.


He has also always loved a camera. Since puppyhood, point one at him and he sits upright, looks straight into the lens and assumes an expression that can only mean:
“Whose da man?


Yet perhaps the most surprising thing about Mickey is his compassion.


He isn’t particularly fond of children, but something changes when he encounters vulnerability. A baby, a sick child or a sick animal brings out another side of him. When our cat was ill, Mickey guarded it with remarkable persistence.


That is Mickey.


Brave enough to take on a Rottweiler.
Sensitive enough to believe nobody loves him.
A ladies’ man.
An escape artist.
A father.
A photographer’s dream.
And a compassionate little guardian when somebody needs him.

Mickey is, in short, a character.
At least from his point of view, he is considerably more than that.